Standard Model interactions
The Standard Model of particles and interactions, based on the
%$SU(3)_c \times SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$% gauge symmetry has been
available since the first versions of both
MadGraph and more recently
of
MadEvent. There is, however, one important differences w.r.t. the
previous version of the package, regarding how the couplings of the
models are handled. As was already mentioned in the previous section,
the task of computing from the parameters in the Lagrangian (primary
parameters) all the secondary parameters (masses, widths and dependent
parameters) needed by
MadGraph is left to an external program, the SM
Calculator. The output of the SM Calculator is a parameter card,
param_card.dat, which contains the numerical values of the main
couplings (primary and secondary) of a specific model. The parameter
card has a format compliant with the SUSY Les Houches Accord.
A simple example is given by the EW parameters that characterize
the gauge %$SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$% interactions and its breaking:
in the Standard Model there are five relevant parameters,
%$\alpha_{em}, G_F, \sin \theta _W, m_Z,m_W$% of which
only three are independent at tree level. Various schemes
differing by the choice of the parameters considered independent are
used in the literature. In the SM Calculator, the default is to take
%$G_F,m_Z,m_W$% as inputs and derive %$\alpha_{em}, \sin \theta_W$%,
but other choices are available. As a result a consistent and unique set of
values of the couplings appearing in the Feynman rules is derived and
used for the computation of the amplitudes.
Another sometimes important feature of our SM implementation, is the
possibility of distinguishing between the kinematic mass (pole mass)
for the quarks and that entering in the Yukawa coupling definition
(%$\overline{MS}$% mass). For the latter, the user can choose to evolve
the mass to the scale corresponding to the Higgs mass, which leads to
an improvement of the perturbative expansion.
Finally, we mention that various versions of the Standard Model are
actually available for specific studies. For example, in the ``minimal
SM'' (sm) the CKM matrix is diagonal while in the smckm
model a mixing between the first and second generation is allowed
(Cabibbo angle). Another example is the sm_nohiggs model where
the Higgs has been eliminated and the EWSB sector behaves as a
non-linear sigma-model.
--
MichelHerquet - 09 Apr 2007